I have read several posts regarding accessibility issues with DNN. As I am still learning about the issue myself, I found some of them very informative and i saw some of them ending up in arguments.....constructive or otherwise.

Therefore, my simple and humble question to the good DNN Core Team / Development Community would be........Is the default installation of DNN 3.3 / 4.1 without any custom skins and modules W3C / ADA / DDA compliant??? If not, are there any plans for development in this area for future releases??

Many Thanks
Arif 

Thanks for your replies.

I know accessibility and compliant HTML are different issues but I have read interviews from Tim O' Brien on Lee Syke's website where they claim that if the document definition is changed to XHTML and some changes are made in default.aspx with minor changes in ascx controls for modules, the website completely validates to W3C standards.

Ofcourse he has used just text/html module on his site. Those changes would need to be spread over all the other ascx controls for the modules. But still, that would be the first step for an accessible website.......completely valid HTML.

Is there any reason why is this process not implemented in the default installation of dotnetnuke??