Archive
Monthly
Go
|
|
DNN Blog
Nov
20
Posted by:
Charles Nurse
11/20/2006
This is the first part in a series of Blogs I intend to write on DotNetNuke Performance.
I recently spent 4 days in Redmond working in the Patterns and Practices groups Testing Lab, and I would like to express my appreciation to a number of people at Microsoft for arranging for this valuable experience, and knowledge transfer. Firstly, my thanks go to Eugenio Pace of the Patterns and Practices group for allowing us to spend 4 days in the testing lab, and to Carlos Ferre, the Patterns and Practices Performance Specialist for working with me during those four days. I would also like to thank Susan Chory and Hao Kung in the ASP.NET team for working with us to develop a Performace Plan.
The testing was carried out on a platform that simulated a Hosting Environment. We used two similar test platforms - each with a single dual processor based Web-Server and a single dual processor based Database Server. Each webserver was loaded up with 500 DotNetNuke instances - one which we used for a baseline measurement was configured with release version 4.3.5, the other webserver being configured with our current working code (4.4.0 Alpha).
I have already blogged on some of the code-bottlenecks that we had found (and fixed) using Profiler tools, and the 4.4.0 Alpha code implements most of the changes as well as some other enhancements. A discussion of the full details of these changes and the tests is beyond the scope of what can be done even in a series of Blogs.
In general, the testing confirmed what we had earlier determined - that we have made some significant improvements in both performance and scalability. Over the next few weeks we will be analysing the results obtained and developing some real guidance for developers - stayed tuned !!
3 comment(s) so far...
Re: Performance Update - Part 1
This is very good news - nice work Charles et al!
By rodneyjoyce on
11/20/2006
|
Re: Performance Update - Part 1
Excellent, I love talking to my non-believing friends (as in don't buy into the DNN revolution) about the greatness of Dotnetnuke. Now I have another tid bit in my arsenal.
Stuart
By slhilbert on
11/21/2006
|
Re: Performance Update - Part 1
Charles -
First of all, MUCH RESPECT, my business wouldn't be what it is today without the huge value I'm able to give my customers through the advanced technology available in the DNN framework.
My question really has to do with advancement in adoption of the ASP.NET framework. Because my company offers custom modules and commercial modules for sale, I am stuck in the 1.1/ VS.NET 2K3 era so that I can support both the 3 and 4 framework of DNN. I'm sure that a some of the advances in performance do depend upon advancements in the 2.0 framework for ASP.NET. At what point are we going to stop offering new versions of the 3.x framework so that we develop on the 2.0 ASP.NET framework as well?
Again, thank you for your hard work and diligence in this project that has been such a blessing to me and my business.
Ryan Morgan ArrowNuke.com
By JimSteele on
11/23/2006
|
|